Zaenal Abidin, Arif Cahyo Utomo, Vira Pratiwi, Laely Farokhah


The lower mathematical reasoning abilities of elementary school students are the background of this research. This happens because students have not been properly facilitated to develop the ability mathematical of reasoning. Mathematics learning can develop reasoning ability well because mathematics learning has systematic concepts and conceptual relationships. This will have an impact on logical, systematic and rational ways of thinking. Therefore, teachers must be able to choose learning models that can facilitate the ability of mathematical reasoning. One learning model that can be used is the literacy project-based learning model. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of improving the ability of mathematical reasoning students who obtain literacy project-based learning. The design of this research was used pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group.  Based on research results, conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of learning that includes n-gain, minimum completeness criteria, and mastery learning. Literacy project-based learning has been effective in facilitating reasoning abilities. That is because literacy project-based learning can present contextual material with literacy works that are made and invited to carry out the process of thinking about the use of mathematical contexts in daily life. Furthermore, students can connect mathematical material with real-life contexts and can make reasoning to interpret learning well.


Project-Based Learning; Literacy; Reasoning Mathematics; Elementary Schools

Full Text:



Abidin , Z. (2016). Mathematical Learning Activity Using Connecting Organizing Reflecting Extending (Core) Models To Improve Mathematical Connection Skills . Proceeding International Conference and Technology, UM Malang. Vol. 2: 68-79.

Abidin , Z and Jupri , A. (2017). The Use of Multiliteration Model to Improve Mathematical Connection Ability of Primary Schools on Geometry . International E-Journal of Advances in Education, 3 (9), 603-610.

Andi Prastowo. (2019). Menumbuhkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Melalui Buku Tematik Kelas Rendah di Sekolah Dasar / Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. JMIE: Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education,3(2), 2019, 100-117. jmie.v3i2.126.

Bill, V. and Jamar, I. (2010). " Disciplinary Literacy in Mathematics Classroom " in Content Matters: A Disciplinary Literacy Approach to Improving Student Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

Concannon-Gibney, T. & McCarthy, MJ (2012). "The Explicit Teaching of Reading Comprehension in Science Class: a Pilot Professional Development Program". Improving Schools. 15 (1), 73-88.

Cresswell, J. (2015). Educational Research: Planning, implementing and Evaluating Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Yogyakarta: Student Library

Eggen P, dan Kauchak D (2012). Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Indeks.

Firdaus, MF, Wahyudin ., Herman, T. (2017). Improving primary students' mathematical literacy through problem-based learning and direct instruction. Academic Journal. Vol. 12 (4), pp. 212-219

Ivanic, R. (2009). "Bringing Literacy Studies into Research and Prospects" in The Future of Literacy Studies. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of Teaching: Models of Teaching ( Issue 8). Yogyakarta: Student Library.

Kemendibud (2016). Revised Curriculum 2013: Mathematics separated from thematic. [On line]. Available: https: /

Levenberg I (2015). Literacy in Mathematics with "Mother Goose". Int. J. Learn. Dev 5 (1): 27-32.

Mahdiyansyah dan Rahmawati (2014). Mathematical Literacy of Students at Secondary Education Level: An Analysis Using International Test Design with Indonesian Context. J. Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 20(4):452-469.

McConachi, SM, et al. (2010). Content Matters: A Disciplinary Literacy Approach to Improving Student Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

McKee, J. and Ogle, D. (2005). Interesting Instruction Literacy and Science. New York: The Guilford Press.

NCTM (2012). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics Volume 1. Michigan: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Novalia, E. (2017). “Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika dan Karakter Kreatif pada Pembelajaran Synectics Materi Bangun Ruang Kelas VIII”. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education

Nugroho, R. A. (2018). HOTS (Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi: KOnsep, Pembelajaran, Penilaian, dan Soal-Soal). Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Ojose, B. (2011). “Mathematics Literacy. Are We Able to Put The Mathematics We Learn Into Everyday User?”. Journal of Mathematics Educations, 4(1): 89-100

Olge, D. et al. (2007). Building Literacy in Social Studies: Strategies for Improving Comprehension and Critical Thinking. Alexandria: ASCD.

Rahman (2018). Literacy Skills in Elementary Schools. Presented in National Workshop and Seminar Developing Literacy of Dyslexic Children in Inclusive Primary Schools. July 21, 2018

Shyyan, et al (2008). Instructional Strategies for Improving Achievement in Reading, Mathematics, and Science for English Language Learners. Assessment for Effective Intervention. 33 (3). 145-155.

Swanson, E., et al. (2011). "Applying a Cohesive Set of Comprehension Strategies to Content Area Instruction". Intervention in School and Clinic. 46 (5), 266-272.

Tai CH, Leou S, Hung JF (2014). Mathematical Literacy of Indigenous Students in Taiwan. Int. Res. J. Sustain. Sci Eng. 2 (3): 1-5.

Tan, M. (2011). "Mathematics and Science Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Regarding The Teaching of Language in Learning Content". Language Teaching Research. 15 (3), 325-342.

Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009), 21 st Century skills. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

Wardono. (2014). “The Realistics Learning Model With Character Education And PISA Assesment To Improve Mathematics Literacy”. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7): 361-372

Zheng A, dan Zhou Y (2011). An Inductive, Interactive And Adaptive Hybrid Problem-Based Learning Methodology: Application to Statistics. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 6(5):639-650.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Copyright © 2017, JMIE  (Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education), p-ISSN: 2580-0868, e-ISSN: 2580-2739


Indexed By: