ACHIEVING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS 4 BY CREATING AN INCLUSIVE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT THROUGH LITERACY PROGRAM INTEGRATED WITH THE ANTI-BULLYING PROGRAM

Zidniyati Zidniyati, Kurniyatul Faizah, Lia Anggraeni

Abstract


This study aimed to create a literate and inclusive school environment by providing literacy and anti-bullying training to elementary school teachers and principals. The research was conducted in 20 primary schools in Banyuwangi Regency, Indonesia over three years from 2021 to 2023. In the first year, the focus was on a balanced literacy program that followed key stages: 1) developing reading and writing habits, 2) searching, browsing, processing, and understanding information, 3) analyzing, responding, and using written texts, and 4) developing understanding and potential to participate in the social environment. The second year focused on an anti-bullying program that targeted indicators like setting consistent rules, creating inclusive study groups, and identifying potential behavior problems. By the third year, 75% of teachers were able to create literacy-rich and inclusive classroom environments, apply consistent rules, and conduct ongoing socialization with other teachers. The results showed improvements in teachers' abilities to implement balanced literacy activities, use reading comprehension methods, create student-authored books, and apply anti-bullying strategies. The study concludes that the integrated literacy and anti-bullying program was successful in preparing students with strong literacy skills while also creating a safe and inclusive learning environment. Overall, this research demonstrates how a holistic approach targeting both literacy development and anti-bullying measures can lead to positive outcomes for elementary school students.

Keywords


Inclusive School; Literacy; Antibullying

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Allington, R. L. (2001). What Really Matters in Reading Instruction. Pearson

Beers, K. (2003). When Kids Can't Read: What Teachers Can Do. Heinemann.

Boeren, E. (2019). Understanding Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 on “quality education” from micro, meso and macro perspectives. International Review of Education, 65(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09772-7

Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2002). Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. In Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/Furze, T. (2012). Review. Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Educational Psychology in Practice, 445. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2012.693682

Campbell, M., & Bauman, S. (2017). Cyberbullying: Definition, consequences, prevalence. In Reducing Cyberbullying in Schools: International Evidence-Based Best Practices (Issue 2013). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811423-0.00001-8

Crawford., A., Saul, E. W., Mathews, S., & Makinster, J. (2005). Teaching and learning strategies for the thingking classroom. In The Reading and Writing for Critical Thingking Project.

Elfert, M. (2019). Lifelong learning in Sustainable Development Goal 4: What does it mean for UNESCO’s rights-based approach to adult learning and education? International Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09788-z

Faisal, & Lova, S. M. (2018). the Development of Reading Learning Material Based. 8(2). Faizah, D. U., Sufyadi, S., Anggraini, L., Waluyo, Dewayani, S., Muldian, W., & Roosaria, D.

R. (2016). Panduan gerakan literasi sekolah di sekolah dasar. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School‐Based Programs to Reduce Bullying and Victimization - Farrington - 2009 - Campbell Systematic Reviews - Wiley Online Library (pp. 1–149). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.4073/csr.2009.6

Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell, G. S. (2017). Guiding Readers and Writers (Grades 3-6): Teaching Comprehension, Genre, and Content Literacy. Heinemann.

Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., & White, H. (2021). Anti-bullying Programmes Toolkit technical report (Issue June, pp. 1–58). University of Cambridge, Campbell Collaboration, Clare Hall Cambridge.

Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85(June 2020), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002

Gee, J. P. (2015). Literacy and education. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding Theory–Method Fit: A Comparison of Three Qualitative Approaches to Theory Building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029

Handarman, Saryono, J., Supriyono, Kamdi, W., Sunaryo, Latipun, Winarsunu, T., Chamisijatin, L., Koesoema, D., Indriyanto, B., Hidayati, S., Kurniawan, Sufyadi, S.,

Setyorini, N. P., Utomo, E., Hadinata, O., Anggraini, L., Setiyorini, H. P. D., Kania, A., & Haura, T. (2017). Panduan Penilaian Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter (2nd ed.).

Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(4), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021963099005545

Hinitz, B. F. (2018). Impeding bullying among young children in international group contexts. In Impeding Bullying Among Young Children in International Group Contexts. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47280-5

Holt, M. K., Vivolo-Kantor, A. M., Polanin, J. R., Holland, K. M., DeGue, S., Matjasko, J. L., Wolfe, M., & Reid, G. (2015). Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: A meta- analysis. Pediatrics, 135(2), e496–e509. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1864

Ismaya, B., Perdana, I., Arifin, A., Fadjarajani, S., Anantadjaya, S. P., & Muhammadiah, M. (2021). Merdeka Belajar in the Point of View of Learning Technology in the Era of 4.0 and Society 5.0. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 1777–1785. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.556

Jalal, F., Anas, Z., Hamka, M., Somantrie, H., Suharyadi, & Sumiyati. (2011). Panduan Pelaksanaan pendidikan karakter. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum dan Perbukuan.

Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? - Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746- 1561.2008.00335.x

Koesoema, D., Sutjipto, Setiawan, D. I., Hanifah, N., Miftahussururi, Nento, M. N., & Akbari,

Q. S. (2017). Pedoman penilaian dan evaluasi gerakan literasi nasional. Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Koyuncu, İ., & Fırat, T. (2020). Investigating reading literacy in PISA 2018 assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189

Lenhart, A. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015:smartphones facilitate shifts in communication landscape for teens. In Pew Reseacrh Center (Vol. 151, Issue April).

Lubis, Y. (2018). VISION: Journal of Language, Literature & Education.

File:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Downloads/Ijtsrd358461.Pdf, 13(13), 1–27.

McGee, L. M., & Richgels, D. J. (2012). Literacy's Beginnings: Supporting Young Readers and Writers. Pearson

OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 Results: What students know and can do (Volume I): Vol. I. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. In OECD Publishing: Vol. II. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_IDN.pdf

OECD. (2020a). PISA 2018 Results. Volume V. Effective Policies, successful schools: Vol. V. OECD. (2020b). PISA 2018 results (Volume IV): Are students smart about money? Vol. IV. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-iv_48ebd1ba-en

OECD. (2020c). PISA 2018 results Are students ready to thrive in an interconnected world? Volume VI. In The Ministry of Education: Vol. VI. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=moe&m= 0204&opType=N&boardSeq=79191

Opertti, R., Walker, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Inclusive education: From targeting groups and schools to achieving quality education as the core of EFA. The SAGE Handbook of Special Education: Two Volume Set, Second Edition, 149–170. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282236.n11

Peren, Sipri. 2002. Membaca Statistik tentang Kasus Bullying di Indonesia – depoedu.com.

Redmond, P., Lock, J. V., & Smart, V. (2020). Developing a cyberbullying conceptual framework for educators. Technology in Society, 60(October), 101223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101223

Richardson, J. S., & Morgan, R. F. (2003). Reading to learn in the context areas (Issue September).

Serpa, S., & Ferrreira, C. M. (2019). Society 5.0 and Sustainability Digital Innovations: a Social Process. Journal of Organizational Culture, 23(1), 1939–4691.

Smith, P. K., Barrio, C. del, & Tokunaga, R. (2013). Definition of bullying and Cyberbullying: How useful are the terms? In Principles of cyberbullying research: Definition, methods, and measures (pp. 64–86). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-9255-10-26

Tavsancil, E., Yildirim, O., & Bilican Demir, S. (2019). Direct and indirect effects of learning strategies and reading enjoyment on pisa 2009 reading performance. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(82), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.82.9

Tikly, L. (2017). The future of education for all as a global regime of educational governance.

Comparative Education Review, 61(1), 22–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/689700 UNESCO. (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. 0–38.

UNESCO. (2019). On the Road to Inclusion. 1–20.

United Nations. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. https://sdgs.un.org/publications/sustainable-development-goals-report-2020-24686 Unterhalter, E. (2019). The Many Meanings of Quality Education: Politics of Targets and

Indicators in SDG4. Global Policy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12591 Valdebenito, S., Eisner, M., Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Sutherland, A. (2018). School‐

based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.

Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.1

Valdebenito, S., Ttofi, M., & Eisner, M. (2015). Prevalence rates of drug use among school bullies and victims: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.004

Zidniyati, Z. (2020). Reconstructing The Nature Of Inclusive School System In Primary School To Strengthening Inclusive Society. Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 11(2),308–329. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-bidayah.v11i2.350




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32934/jmie.v8i1.576

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Copyright © 2017, JMIE: Journal of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education, p-ISSN: 2580-0868, e-ISSN: 2580-2739

 

Indexed By:

 Logo Google Scholar Logo Garuda Logo Crossref Logo  Base  Logo Dimensions Logo Indonesia Onesearch